Latest News

The evolving interest rate landscape

Dr. Francois Stofberg: Senior Economist at Efficient Wealth and the Managing Director of Efficient Private Clients.

The first interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve (Fed) has happened and now the focus has shifted from “when” to “where”: Where are interest rates heading next? This shift is more than a mere change in phrasing; it is a sign of the evolving economic landscape, with real consequences for growth, investment, and employment.

The path of interest rates affects every corner of the economy, from the cost of borrowing for a home to whether companies invest in new projects. Economists use the term “neutral real Fed policy rate”, or R-star, to describe the level of interest rates that is neither too stimulative nor too restrictive for economic growth. This is a kind of Goldilocks zone: Not too hot, not too cold, but just right.

In 2018, inflation was on target at 2% and unemployment was low. The Fed raised its policy rate to 2.5%, translating to a real rate of about 0.5%. Many viewed this as the new normal for monetary policy. But the financial landscape has changed since then. The yield curve (a key indicator used by economists to determine where rates are headed) has shown unusual trends, making this moment different from the past.

Before the global financial crisis, real policy rates typically hovered around 2% but, now, projections suggest a target for the funds rate of about 3% once inflation stabilises at 2%. However, determining the neutral rate today is more challenging, particularly as the world wrestles with new forces like rising government debt, shifting demographics, and the transformative power of artificial intelligence (AI).

Some experts believe that the neutral rate needs to be much higher than the pre-pandemic 0.5% level, citing factors such as rising deficits, which require higher interest to attract investors, and the prospect of an AI-driven productivity boom, which could increase demand for loans. If companies need more money to invest in technology and innovation, interest rates might need to rise to balance that demand.

There is also the term premium to consider. The term premium is the extra return investors demand to hold longer-term bonds instead of shorter-term bonds. Typically, the yield curve has a positive slope, meaning rates increase over time to compensate investors for holding longer-term debt. However, recent inversions (where short-term rates are higher than long-term rates) have caused confusion and concern. These inversions are likely a temporary distortion rather than the new normal.

The yield curve is expected to adjust by steepening (where long-term rates rise relative to short-term rates) to attract enough buyers for the growing pile of government bonds. Investors will demand a higher term premium, meaning that they will want more return for holding bonds for longer. For fixed-income investors, this could be a positive development. They might be rewarded not only for the interest rate risk that they bear but also enjoy the hedge that bonds provide when the economy hits a rough patch.

What does this mean for interest rates in South Africa (SA)? The Fed’s actions often have significant ripple effects on emerging markets, including SA. As United States interest rates adjust, SA may face increased pressure on its own rates to maintain investor confidence and manage capital flows.

The evolving interest rate landscape is a story of change; a story that affects each of us differently, depending on our place in the economy. But, as with most things, change also brings opportunity. For those willing to adapt, the shifting contours of rates, yields, and economic policy could open new doors to financial security and growth.

If leaders fail, children suffer

Dr. Francois Stofberg: Senior Economist at Efficient Wealth and the Managing Director of Efficient Private Clients.

South Africa’s (SA’s) post-apartheid dream of a prosperous nation remains unrealised for many. While political freedom was achieved in 1994, economic freedom and opportunity have lagged. Poor leadership, particularly in government, is a key cause of this. A lack of accountability has resulted in flawed policies that hinder economic progress, leaving millions in poverty.

Leadership failures and policy missteps
Much of SA’s economic hardship stems from leadership failures during critical moments. For more than 30 years, under the African National Congress (ANC), decisions lacked accountability and a focus on long-term goals. Despite initial successes after 1994, the government failed to create policies that would foster sustainable growth and economic freedom. Corruption and mismanagement became entrenched, leading to a failure to deliver on promises of economic development. Instead of encouraging entrepreneurship and attracting foreign investment, the government turned to populist rhetoric and short-term solutions. This has led to failing infrastructure, unreliable energy supply, and a regulatory environment that discourages business growth.

Rising unemployment and deepening poverty
The lack of sound economic policies has resulted in a persistent unemployment crisis, which is one of SA’s most pressing issues. In 1994, job creation was a central promise of the new government. Yet, three decades later, unemployment, particularly among the youth, has skyrocketed. Youth unemployment often exceeds 50%, leaving an entire generation without hope or opportunity. High unemployment, in turn, directly leads to deeper poverty. Families are left without income, and children suffer the most. When parents are jobless, their children face the consequences – poor access to education, healthcare, and nutrition. These children are trapped in a cycle of poverty that is difficult to escape.

Childhood poverty: The toll of poor governance
The suffering of children is the most visible sign of a government’s leadership failures. Statistics show that about 60% of South African children live below the poverty line. These children face an uphill battle, lacking access to quality education, adequate healthcare, and proper nutrition. Schools are underfunded, infrastructure is inadequate, and many educators lack the necessary training. As a result, millions of children receive substandard education, which limits their chances of breaking free from the cycle of poverty. The long-term impact is profound: A poorly-educated population cannot contribute meaningfully to the economy, which further hinders growth.

A shift in the political landscape
Despite this bleak situation, there are signs of change and hope in SA’s political landscape. The ANC is losing its grip on power and disillusioned voters are turning to alternatives like the Government of National Unity, a coalition of opposition parties that offers a fresh approach to governance. The Democratic Alliance (DA), a key coalition player, has demonstrated that action-oriented leadership can lead to tangible improvements (although they have lost much of their vigour in recent years). In areas under DA control, such as Cape Town, there have been clear signs of progress – better infrastructure, improved service delivery, and policies that support economic growth. This shift towards more accountable, results-driven governance is offering hope to a weary population.

The way forward: Action-oriented leadership
SA is at a crucial juncture. The next decade will be pivotal as the country moves away from a leadership style that failed to deliver sustainable growth. Action-oriented, accountable leadership, as seen in the private sector, is essential to reversing the country’s fortunes. The focus must be on creating an environment that is conducive to economic growth, which includes improving education and rebuilding critical infrastructure.

For the millions of children who suffer under the weight of poverty, these changes are vital. If political leaders can adopt policies that prioritise long-term growth over short-term growth, SA can begin to break free from the cycle of poverty. Leadership that values accountability and measurable outcomes can ensure that children grow up with opportunities for a better future. The legacy of poor governance has left a lasting mark on the country but, with political shifts and a focus on action, there is hope for recovery.

If leaders fail, children suffer. But if leaders succeed, there is hope for a better, more prosperous future for us all.

The tale of two economies: Lessons from the north

The pulse of global economics

The impact of interest rates on South African Assets

Can central banks guide economies to a soft landing?

Walmart’s resilience and Africa’s reform momentum

Making informed investment decisions

Dr. Francois Stofberg: Senior Economist at Efficient Wealth and the Managing Director of Efficient Private Clients.

This week we focus on the economic principles of market sentiment, interest rate impacts, and investor behaviour in response to central bank actions. Understanding these principles is critical when making investment decisions.

As the weekend drew to a close, investors around the globe braced themselves for another week of renewed market volatility. Concerns are mounting that the Federal Reserve’s sluggish response to the cooling US economy will soon lead to rapid interest rate cuts to catch up. The stage was set for a dramatic Monday market reopening.

Friday’s disappointing US jobs data intensified the sell-off in an already jittery market. The Nasdaq index fell into correction territory, while haven assets like Treasuries experienced a sharp rally. Investors asked whether Friday’s jobs numbers were a statistical anomaly or indicative of a severe economic slowdown.

The Federal Reserve’s decision to hold rates steady last week only fuelled the fire. The market’s severe reaction to the jobs data suggested that investors believed the Fed had erred in not cutting rates. Over the weekend, many began advocating for a 0.5 percentage point rate cut (to around 4%) at the Fed’s next two meetings. Bullish sentiment on volatility emerged, echoed in the Vix index, Wall Street’s fear gauge, which spiked to 29 points, the highest since the regional banking crisis of 2023.

This week started with a sell-off in richly valued big-tech stocks. The Nasdaq Composite fell by 3.4% for the week, marking a more than 10% decline since its all-time high in July. Treasuries, conversely, saw yields on the 10-year note drop to their lowest levels since December, settling at 3.82%.

Major investors disclosed significant reductions in tech holdings while increasing cash positions to record levels and buying Treasuries. This move underscored the broader market uncertainty and the fleeing to safer assets. Despite recession fears and the likelihood of additional Fed rate cuts, equity valuations have not yet signalled an economic catastrophe.

On Monday, markets initially dropped across global indices. The Stoxx Europe 600 fell by 1.6%, led by a significant decline in semiconductor manufacturers following major job cut announcements. Asian markets had already endured a bruising session, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 experiencing its second-worst point decline ever, shedding 2,216 points.

Japan’s economy added another layer of complexity to the global market scenario. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) surprisingly decided to raise its benchmark interest rate to 0.25% last week, the highest level in 15 years. This signifies a shift in Japan’s monetary policy, traditionally characterized by ultra-low rates. This decision to hike rates was driven by concerns over a weak yen and negative terms of trade, impacting the nation’s economic stability. The yen strengthened against the dollar, reaching ¥148.56 during early Thursday trading, putting pressure on Japanese exporters and large multinational companies like Toyota and Panasonic, whose shares saw significant declines.

US manufacturing data, suggesting a labour market slowdown, compounded global market weakness. A significant share price plunge further spooked investors in Tokyo, highlighting the interconnectedness of global markets and the impact of US economic health on worldwide investor sentiment.

The US labour market showed more signs of cooling than expected, with only 114,000 jobs added in July and the unemployment rate rising to 4.3%. This led traders to increase their bets on significant rate cuts by the Fed before year-end. Treasury yields fell further, with the two-year yield dropping below 4% for the first time since May.

August’s market narrative is dominated by concerns over a slowing US economy, the Federal Reserve’s next moves, and the broader implications for global markets. Investors are closely watching for any signals from the Fed that could alleviate or exacerbate these fears, with the potential for renewed volatility on the horizon.

Making informed investment decisions

A journey through SA’s unemployment crisis